Da eard is flat!

At 1:15 minutes:seconds into this video you will see our sun above the clouds from an airplane. Does this look like our sun is 93 million miles above us, or more like 50 miles up?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBXltED3-bwAnother thing that is very curious about our sun is that when observed from above the clouds, it is very noticeably larger in size to our eyes than when we are on the ground. This does not make sense if the popular narrative of 93 million miles is true because observing the sun from 8 miles above the earth would not change our perspective enough over a distance of 93 million miles to make it appear larger. But it definitely looks much larger. It should appear the same size. You could not detect any difference. Occam's razor would tell us that the explanation is that the sun is close enough to our earth that, in fact, one would observe this noticeable difference. In fact, I believe that Occam's razor would tell us that you would be hard pressed to detect with your eyes this obvious size difference if the sun were 1000 miles away. Being 8/1000ths closer would hardly cause the huge size difference that we are seeing. If it looks half again as big at 8 miles up as it does from sea level it would not be very far away would it? You need to look through a proper filter to see this, or you might damage your eyes. We have not been looking at it too much, have we, because of that?
 
I honestly didn't see anything odd or interesting in that video. ?No hot spots if you ask me. ?You can't tell how big the sun looks without a filter. ?The camera doesn't handle the bright light as well without all the atmosphere in the way. ?Do you know why the sun and moon both look bigger at sunrise and sunset?You asked earlier how a cloud could be reflective... What is a cloud made of? ?hmmm
 
You see a hot spot in this video at 3 minutes in, and more. Notice how the sun, and earth stay in sync with each other as the balloon bounces the camera? If the sun was 93 million miles away, the sun should not move in, and out of the frame in the exact same way that a near earth does. Of course, you can see with your own eyes that it is very close.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcteYfOMgJg
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcgxBTrmIhU#t=168.893416When using a compass, one end of the needle points north, and the other south. If it is each of the poles that exert magnetic forces on this compass, why doesn't the end of the needle that points south point down toward the earth, as the south pole is through a big chunk of the earth from here? It doesn't is the simplest explanation. The north pole exerts it's magnetic force, but the south does not.
 
I appreciate you guys sharing your experience seeing the curve from high altitudes. My hope has been to do the same experiments that first proved the earth a globe, any on the ground testing. This was determined before anyone started going up high in the sky. So where are those experiments that proved it? Eratosthenes certainly did not prove it, although he is cited as having done. In fact, if his data is correct, he proved to me that the sun is 61.775 miles up. Einstein, and Copernicus had theories that they both said they could not prove. Theories are not fact without proof. I have, however, been able to find on the ground experiments done by scientists that proved the earth stationary. These were thrown out because they disproved copernican theory, which had been chosen as the altar of modern scientific worship. We live in a day when hyper speculation poses as science, and repeatable experimentation is a thing of the past. Theoretical physicists, astrophysicists have been set loose to dream up whatever they might, while practical experiments that give the "wrong" conclusion have long ago simply been thrown out.?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxMSL9h2ziY
 
Here is an article that explains how I can make such bold statements as in my previous post. When Hubble says that the data collected in an experiment must not validate certain conclusions based on his philosophical outlook, obviously the fix is in. You, too, can have things named after you if you agree to worship only at the altar of Copernican theory.http://www.geocentrism.com/assumptions.htm
 
Posted by: integra3g?I heard talk of this on the radio and it made me sad. ?We should continue to become smarter are a whole said:
Check out this 2 minute video of how weather works on a flat earth map. It makes sense.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqKTLzUKqDcAnd here is the link to the site where you can play with the weather on different maps:https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/overlay=temp/azimuthal_equidistant=0.00,90.00,76?And here is a depiction of how the sun, and moon travel above earth, causing the different seasons:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R52_PdZlSq8
Click to expand...
 
The first 9 minutes of this video show high US government officials discussing how Nixon decided to film the first man stepping on to the moon in a studio, "just in case nasa could not get a live feed back from the moon.":0The next 8 minutes shows how the nasa Orion program is testing space craft to see IF they can get manned craft safely through the radiation of space. It's as if we had never done that before when you hear what they say. :0The rest is basically an interview with a man that claims to have worked for nasa painting pictures of space, and how he was told that the earth is flat with antarctica as an ice rim around the edge of a circular earth disc. He uses some foul language, so I cannot recommend watching this part.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hUIv_84ZA9E
 
Here is a short video with video from several high altitude weather balloons. The horizon is at eye level with the camera, and no curve can be detected in any direction. The sun looks very close, too, as always.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_wQ0XopU_o&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs
 
Here is a very reasonable explanation as to why the bottoms of things disappear over distances, and it is not because of a curve.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWJdZXlPZb8&feature=em-subs_digest-vrecs
 
Here is a short video that shows that some nasa astronots say that you see stars all day long while in space, and others that say that you cannot see stars in space. Hmmmm. How does that happen? Some astronots see spectacular views, and others see blackness? Maybe they forgot to get their lie straight? That's what I think.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksSZPNQaFP8
 
Students film breathtaking curvature of Earth using high-altitude weather balloonhttps://phys.org/news/2017-01-students-breathtaking-curvature-earth-high-altitude.html
 
Photos by the GOES-16 Satellitehttp://www.space.com/35422-amazing-earth-from-space-photos-by-goes-16.html?
 
Posted by: fperkinsPhotos by the GOES-16 Satellitehttp://www.space.com/35422-amazing-earth-from-space-photos-by-goes-16.html said:
NASA images have been changing drastically through the years. They admit that they use photo editing software to make their pictures. They string collected data sets together, then an artist dresses it up to look nice. The second video here shows, as you can see, a definite size upgrade for North America compared to other "photos" we have been shown. The last video here shows the latest goes 16 satellite image in photoshop looking definitely flaky around the edges, and in my opinion, all in between, too.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWTdAxm3Opchttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaRurjWjf4Yhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osDF8PdFtVY
Click to expand...
 
Here is a short video dealing specifically with that balloon launched in England by the physics students:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwlHduNoPO8#t=221.282062
 
Railways in South America thousands of miles long with no gradient? Yes. Plane geometry, and trigonometry used by pilots, sailors, surveyors instead of globular geometry, and trigonometry? Yes. Water seeks it's own level? Yes. Flat maps taken to sea instead of globe models? Yes. Curvature of earth disregarded when laying out railways, canals, tunnels? Yes.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcgxBTrmIhU#t=168.893416
 
If we are living on a sphere then how is it that we always see the horizon at our eye level? This video shows the math that proves, to me at least, that we would never see it at eye level on a spherical earth.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X_Tw27wWv0
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top