I think I'm at the point of selling the closed loop equipment I was going to use and going with Tunze Streams. The risk associated with drilling 6 holes and the possibility of leaks from the countless bulkheads, joints and fitting just seems to deter me from doing it.
That being said, should I go with a dual 6000 setup around 1850 gph max per powerhead or go with the dual 6100 with 3170 gph max each.
Now for the specifics of the tank. DAS 115 flatbacked hex tank with corner overflow and barebottom. Tank deminsions are roughly 50"x24"x26". It will have a Blueline BL1100 (1100 gph max) on an OM Squirt at the top 4 corners. It will be a mixed SPS/LPS tank with more emphasis on the SPS, but the wife likes LPS so there has to be some.
I know the Streams can be dialed back and gradually brought up to full power, but I'd rather not spend the extra money for the 6100's if they will more than likely never be ran full in a 4+' long tank. I could use the extra money later to buy another 6000.
Thanks for everyones help in deciding between the CL or the Tunze :wink:
That being said, should I go with a dual 6000 setup around 1850 gph max per powerhead or go with the dual 6100 with 3170 gph max each.
Now for the specifics of the tank. DAS 115 flatbacked hex tank with corner overflow and barebottom. Tank deminsions are roughly 50"x24"x26". It will have a Blueline BL1100 (1100 gph max) on an OM Squirt at the top 4 corners. It will be a mixed SPS/LPS tank with more emphasis on the SPS, but the wife likes LPS so there has to be some.
I know the Streams can be dialed back and gradually brought up to full power, but I'd rather not spend the extra money for the 6100's if they will more than likely never be ran full in a 4+' long tank. I could use the extra money later to buy another 6000.
Thanks for everyones help in deciding between the CL or the Tunze :wink: