I agree with patteto.
Here is the problem I have with all of this. If I am buying that coral, I expect it to look like the picture that is shown, and I believe I would be greatly disappointed if it did not look like the original picture. The pics don?t look that bad scaled down like I have them, but when they are big, the color corrected pictures look ok, not great like theirs does. This brings to mind for me the ethical business practice of the vendor, I have no experience buying from this vendor- so my opinion is based solely on this picture and a number of others like this I have seen on their page.
To me, this picture represents one of two things: they either have no Photoshop skills to color correct or they are trying to deceive the customers. If it is the former, then they do not need to be in the business of selling corals on the internet, but it is a somewhat dismissible offense. If it is the latter, then that is a far graver offense in my opinion.
While it might seem trivial to some, seeing errors like this, to me, begs the question of what other things is this company doing? If they can not accurately display their inventory, are they accurately portraying their facilities, their maintenance practices, their quarantine practices, and a plethora of other "relevant to the customer" types of information?
I could be completely off base here and perhaps because of the camera, they had to tint the picture that blue to get the true color, but who knows. I would like to give every company the benefit of the doubt, but when my hard earned money goes to purchase something, I need something more than the benefit of the doubt.