Did some titration and found that the akalinity is too high. Do you think if I increase the calcium reactor CO2 said:I agree, if you are not having a calcium snowstorm in your tank it will probably be fine. Just stop adding anymore buffer at this time. And watch your calcium levels closely, that high level of alk. may make your calcium level drop. It would better if the alk. level just dropped slowly less of a shock than a quick drop. The level you have, watch it closely when you get it near where you want it, start back to normal buffering. You don't want to let it get away and have it swing way back to the other end of the scale.
just to update since it was me who did the test... Ca 440ppm alk 11.2dKH Salifert test kits said:This looks about perfect.
The Alk is definately right on target, and the calcium is good but don't go any higher. 400 is my target range for calcium and I wish I could keep my alk at 11.
I was pretty sure about the alk of 11 being good, but I just pulled out my "Marine Aquarium Reference" by Martin Moe and it states that the optimum Alk is 6 meq/l. 6 meq/l comes to 11.2 dKH. Your perfect.![]()
just to update since it was me who did the test... Ca 440ppm alk 11.2dKH Salifert test kits said:You keep it like that and your corals will grow right before your eyes. :shock:
That is awesome. I was trying to figure how to lower since Phillip told me it's too high. Well said:You are probably safe with regards to your PH.
Unfortunately, pretty much all hobby grade test kits and meters are just that, "Hobby Grade". I can't speak to the accuracy of digital meters since I have never owned any until about a month ago when I bought my first TDS meter and Hanna PH meter. I am not hearing the best things about American Marine (Pinpoint) or Milwaukee meters in my recent research. Some of the input is from very reputable sources also. It looks like you have to spend in excess of $200.00 to get a quality product at least for PH monitoring, but that is probably not necessary for most hobbiests unless you have some extra cash burning a hole in your pocket. If you decide on a test kit using regents, pre-measured dry kits are the most accurate. User error has much less effect on this type of test.
Sorry for the rant. I would say that whichever method, and brand of tester you ultimately feel the most comfortable with, you should use one kind/brand for consistency and strive for a stable measurement (within acceptable parameters) with that test kit or meter.